-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 4
Define methods for admin cli in client service #19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request enhances the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client as API Client
participant Service as ClientService
Client->>Service: CreateExporter(CreateExporterRequest)
Service-->>Client: Exporter
Client->>Service: UpdateExporter(UpdateExporterRequest)
Service-->>Client: Exporter
Client->>Service: DeleteExporter(DeleteExporterRequest)
Service-->>Client: google.protobuf.Empty
sequenceDiagram
participant Client as API Client
participant Service as ClientService
Client->>Service: GetClient(GetClientRequest)
Service-->>Client: Client
Client->>Service: ListClients(ListClientsRequest)
Service-->>Client: ListClientsResponse
Client->>Service: CreateClient(CreateClientRequest)
Service-->>Client: Client
Client->>Service: UpdateClient(UpdateClientRequest)
Service-->>Client: Client
Client->>Service: DeleteClient(DeleteClientRequest)
Service-->>Client: google.protobuf.Empty
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
proto/jumpstarter/client/v1/client.proto (2)
192-195: New Message: UpdateExporterRequest
TheUpdateExporterRequestcarries a requiredexporterand an optionalupdate_mask. While this structure allows flexible updates, consider whether an update mask might sometimes be necessary by default to avoid inadvertent full updates.
226-234: New Message: CreateClientRequest
TheCreateClientRequestmessage comprises a requiredparent, an optionalclient_id, and a requiredclient. This design is clear; however, it would be helpful to document how the service handles cases whenclient_idis not provided (e.g., auto-generation).
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
proto/jumpstarter/client/v1/client.proto(3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (17)
proto/jumpstarter/client/v1/client.proto (17)
31-37: New RPC Method: CreateExporter
TheCreateExporterRPC method is added with an HTTP POST mapping and includes the signatureparent,exporter,exporter_id. This neatly follows RESTful design principles. Please verify that the method’s signature and HTTP path align with the overall API design and that any consuming clients are updated accordingly.
38-44: New RPC Method: UpdateExporter
TheUpdateExporterRPC is now defined with an HTTP PATCH method and uses the signatureexporter,update_mask. This gives clients the ability to perform partial updates. Ensure that the optionalupdate_maskbehavior is clearly documented in the API guides.
45-48: New RPC Method: DeleteExporter
TheDeleteExportermethod employs the HTTP DELETE verb with the expectednameparameter. This implementation is consistent with standard deletion patterns.
50-53: New RPC Method: GetClient
The newly addedGetClientmethod uses an HTTP GET method to retrieve client details by name. Its definition is concise and adheres to standard patterns for resource retrieval.
54-57: New RPC Method: ListClients
TheListClientsRPC, implemented with an HTTP GET method, takes aparentparameter to list client resources. The design follows established pagination patterns. Confirm that the associated server-side logic correctly handles optional pagination parameters.
58-64: New RPC Method: CreateClient
TheCreateClientmethod is defined with an HTTP POST endpoint and a signature ofparent,client,client_id. This setup is clear and functional. Consider documenting how the API handles an omittedclient_id(for example, whether it is auto-generated server-side).
65-71: New RPC Method: UpdateClient
TheUpdateClientRPC, using an HTTP PATCH method with a signature ofclient,update_mask, supports partial updates. Its design is in line with other update methods in the API. Ensure that the optional inclusion ofupdate_maskis clearly explained in the documentation.
72-75: New RPC Method: DeleteClient
TheDeleteClientmethod has been added with an HTTP DELETE endpoint that accepts anameparameter. This follows the conventional pattern for delete operations.
113-115: Exporter Message: Required Labels Field Update
TheExportermessage now marks thelabelsfield as required by using the field behavior annotation. This enforces that every exporter resource includes its labels, thereby strengthening the API contract. Just ensure that all client implementations provide this field.
117-127: Client Message: Required Labels Field Update
Within theClientmessage, thelabelsfield has been updated to be required. This change enforces consistent metadata inclusion across client resources. It is advisable to confirm that such a change does not break backward compatibility with existing clients.
182-190: New Message: CreateExporterRequest
TheCreateExporterRequestmessage is introduced with a requiredparent, an optionalexporter_id, and a requiredexporterfield. Its structure aligns well with common API request patterns for resource creation.
197-202: New Message: DeleteExporterRequest
TheDeleteExporterRequestis straightforward; it requires the resourcenameand leverages a resource reference, following standard deletion request designs.
204-209: New Message: GetClientRequest
TheGetClientRequestmessage succinctly defines a requirednamefield to fetch a client resource. Its structure is clear and consistent with other GET requests across the API.
211-218: New Message: ListClientsRequest
TheListClientsRequestmessage includes a requiredparentand optional parameters for pagination and filtering. This design facilitates flexible client listing operations.
221-224: New Message: ListClientsResponse
TheListClientsResponsemessage encapsulates a list of clients along with anext_page_tokenfor pagination. Verify that the service implementation correctly populates these fields to support smooth client-side pagination.
236-239: New Message: UpdateClientRequest
TheUpdateClientRequestcarries the required client data and an optionalupdate_maskto support partial updates. This aligns with similar update patterns in the API.
241-246: New Message: DeleteClientRequest
TheDeleteClientRequestmessage correctly requires thenamefield to specify the client resource to be deleted, mirroring the approach used inDeleteExporterRequest.
Summary by CodeRabbit